Bad Assistant

...just do it. Don’t wait for someone to hand you a million dollars—just put yourself out there however you can.
— Preeti Mistry, In the Company of Women
Elizabeth Moss as Peggy Olson in Mad Men

Elizabeth Moss as Peggy Olson in Mad Men

"I'm a terrible assistant."

This I said to my mother last week as we left my cousin, Josie's, graduation lunch. I sat in the passenger's seat gazing through the window at the cars gathered before the stop light. My mother looked at me from the driver's seat with a raised brow. I gesticulated.

"I mean, I'm a good assistant. But in my head, I'm a terrible assistant. I don't have the personality for it is what I mean."

I unraveled a few explanations as to how I came to that conclusion. In one scenario, I lament the overcomplicated, inefficient process one of my colleagues enlists my help for. Instead of using one order to request all necessary documents for a tax record, she asks me to order everything separately, costing the company more money for information that will come back in the same format regardless of how it's processed. In a different scenario, I am asking another colleague multiple times to please provide all pages of a form that is 2+ pages in length per the request of our investors, only to have said colleague argue with me about its necessity, then completely ignore me when she enlists my help later on for similar work, and only for me to have to remind her yet again that she has to organize all required documents before sending them on to me. The former scenario is not of much concern. We've all worked with someone who will ask us to complete a task in what seems the most tedious process possible, but since it is their particular preference it is good ethos to complete it as requested. The latter issue, however, is one that continues to annoy.

It is one thing to be peppered with pleas for help on a daily basis. This is the purpose of the assistant. And yet, as much help as the assistant offers there's little room for her to take any authority, for either herself or her work. This is because her work is not her own, but that of everyone else's. If she asks a colleague to do something a specific way before transitioning the task to her hands for completion she is tempered, if not altogether ignored. In order for her to be taken seriously she has to transfer the issue to a senior member to resolve the issue, all the while wondering if there will be backlash from said colleague. This is hierarchical office politics. This is normal. It may not even seem a matter worth writing about. Until I realize that, through all of this unnecessary ping-ponging, I've managed to outgrow my assistant job in a little under two years.

So what does this mean for me? When I say I don't have the personality for an assistant it's because I prefer to do things my own way. From my perspective, I'm a capable adult who can adequately discern the method used to execute a task for maximum efficiency. On the one hand, yes, I was raised an only child with helicopter parents who liked to take control of her activities and dictate what they deemed proper social responses. As an adult, I've outpaced that girl, growing steadily into a person who struggles with answering to someone rather than being the someone who is answered to. In other words, the way my personality has developed I need to be the boss, and instead of accepting that this may never happen for me in a corporate office I want to take this idea in a different direction. One of the most fortuitous aspects of being a writer is that writing gives you purpose, a sense of control and authority. The more you write, the more inevitable your influence, the more power you wield, the more gratitude you develop for the practice. This effect ripples into contact with numerous aspects of our lives and, in the past, has helped me better bridge my identity as a writer with that of my identity as a working professional.

My job has been a source of emotional discord since I began with my company in June of 2015. As I am wont to do, I envisioned a much clearer path of promotion for myself than what's been offered to me. I've tried blaming this on myself, but I know that I've made my goals clear to my boss. I know that I've expressed to him exactly what my issues are, the areas I'd like to grow into, how I'd like to get there. On the surface, we seem to be on the same page about my concerns and how to rectify them. And yet, I find that I’m unwilling to let things end there. In a way, I guess, I realize I’m unwilling to accept my boss’s word, to trust that I’ve conveyed myself properly and that he’s understood exactly what I’ve said. This may be my own fault more than his, if he is to blame at all, which, placing blame on anyone but myself has always felt counterproductive—I can’t control other people, influence them yes, but ultimately they are of their own mind. I am learning more and more that if I want something done for myself I have to be the one to do it. This is base knowledge, of course, but you’d be amazed by how willing we are in our subconscious to let other people dictate our lives because we can’t stomach potential conflict or intimidation or what-have-you. Especially in the corporate economy, and especially when you’re a young woman in the corporate economy. Regardless of location, this can be a hard lesson to learn. But the truth is that we often have to make diplomatic demands of others within our company in order for anyone to acknowledge that we exist and have a voice, otherwise we are ghosts who float about the office for coffee and a bathroom break and lunch, but not of much consequence to the culture at large.

Amid all my other interests, my interest in the corporate sector has remained in tact. Even before I secured my job as a mortgage assistant, I was obsessed with the idea of getting onto Main Street in the Business District downtown. Yes, I’ve dealt with a substantial amount of creative unease and depression since I’ve been in this position, but I owe that more to my failing at routine and discipline and seeking proper help. I also failed at conjoining my interests. I’m interested in myself as a business woman, but I’m also interested in myself as a writer, a philanthropist, an entrepreneur. If I’ve been mentally unhinged over the last two years, or ever, it’s because I’ve fought with the idea that all of my varying interests could successfully inhabit this one body. In the past I’ve tried to make myself one-dimensional rather than pulling my curiosities together and sending them in the same direction. Last week, I read an article by Oliver Emberton in which he discusses the "great" idea and how having more than one can impede our goals. He says:

Most people aren’t failing because of their potential. They’re failing because their potential is spread in too many directions.
— from If You Want to Follow Your Dreams You Have to Say No to All the Alternatives

This resonated with me as a piece of neglected self-knowledge I was vaguely aware of experiencing, but didn’t try very hard to understand. And maybe that’s because making a firm decision about which direction to take my life could provoke unforeseen consequences. It would also mean I’d have to make a serious commitment. As I write this, I’m vacationing with my parents in Myrtle Bech. Yesterday afternoon, as my mom and I were walking against a heavy wind, I stated, “I want to do something entrepreneurial.” “Like what?” she asked. “I don’t know exactly. But I do know that I want to work for myself and I want it to be digital. I want to work online.” With more deliberation, however, I realized that the digital sphere would merely be a component to the overall ideation of my creative pursuits. Yes, I want to build an online community, create a digital space where people like to drop by for interesting, insightful, and entertaining reads. For too long, though, I’ve had this idea that I could only have my creative life or my professional life. I also have to acknowledge that part of my entrepreneurial desires is sensing a lack of control in my career trajectory, which doesn’t need to be as wayward as I’ve made it. Oliver goes on to list this bullet point in his article:

Line up your bumblebees. You may not be able to create the next Google, cure cancer and land on Mars at the same time. But you might be able to simultaneously become, say, a successful and athletic CEO. Success and fitness can be complementary goals: a healthier person can be a better leader. They’re like two bumblebees, pushing in the same direction, and stronger for it.

In college, professor Heidi Nobles gave me a collection of Dana Gioia poems, Daily Horoscope, that she found especially profitable for me. I’d just turned 19 and was working at a small community bank outside of campus. I often felt disconnected with university culture and worried that I’d made a mistake venturing into even the slightest realm of corporate America. However, she assured me that important creative work could be done by people even in the business world, as Gioia spent over a decade working for General Foods as he worked toward his first publication. Why this became such a revelation to me is astounding, and still more astounding that I am, to this day, struggling to fully realize it. It’s not that I’ve gotten myself into a position where my interests are in conflict with each other, it’s that I’ve failed to see how they complement one another. I’ve been woefully unable to send all of my interests in the same direction toward the same goal, namely because I haven’t spent enough time with them to even figure out what that goal is.

There are a few things I’ve come to understand, though. If I want to get anything valuable done, I’m going to have to make some commitments. What I’ve tried to do in the past is create astronomical goals that were grossly unattainable. I constantly set myself up for failure, languished in the aftermath, and spent an unhealthy amount of time nursing my wounds before being able to restrategize. But the commitments I’m about to make don’t have to be so damning, and if done with patience and diligence, could actually become a liberating personal trinity for living. Here’s what I have in mind:

1. Commit to Writing
And the glorious realization, or acceptance rather, that I’ve made is that writing for this blog or in a journal can be enough. Do I want to write a book? Yes. But I also know that, as Emberton lightly touches on in his article, there is a season for our goals. They don’t all have to be done at once, and in fact, when we can push more than one of them toward a larger goal we will create more velocity to attain that goal, and its subgoals, quicker than if we try to propel ourselves in too many different directions.

2. Commit to Education
My education is something that can be more simplified than it is. Apart from the job I get paid to do, I am a writer at heart. But I know that I don’t have to get an education in writing through formal schooling nor do I think it’s necessarily the right path for me. Though sometimes I want it to be. I fought so much with myself after graduation that academic writing, or a terminal creative degree, was the direction I needed to take my life. But the truth is that I much prefer to fulfill that education on my own terms than through preordained course requirements. While there a few classes in college I enjoyed enormously, and which benefited me in ways I can appreciate on a daily basis, I struggled with the academic environment. I even ran away from an offer of tuition coverage, textbook assistance, and a fellowship at Winthrop University when I was 23. Something about it simply didn’t feel right and that is a feeling that still resonates to this day. However, that certainly doesn’t mean I can’t be a writer. I truly believe that this blog could touch a lot of people if I gave it the proper attention, and where I want to create that online community and work with a digital brand, this space could supplement that entrepreneurial craving and even help identify whether that is something I want to take on as a business commitment in the future. I don’t deny that I might benefit from some avenue of formal education—I’ve actually wondered at times if an MBA might help me not only professionally but creatively and entrepreneurially as well—but certainly writing, therefore doing the work of understanding my thoughts, would help me gauge more specific commitment decisions I need to make about my education and my future.

3. Commit to Community
I’ve also fought with myself a lot over the years on whether or not Columbia is THE place for that future. Many of my friends and family think it is too economy poor, still too lacking as a consumer environment, most likely never putting itself in a position to be on the same level as a Charleston or an Asheville or a Savannah. Maybe it is because I work downtown but I have lover’s eyes for Main Street, therefore I will always want to think the best of Columbia’s direction. And it does have direction. The city is growing, and there is something fascinating to me about being in the middle of that. I’ve wanted to make the commitment to Columbia for a long time, but I always worry that this decision will disappoint people, that maybe they’ll see it as an unwillingness to try harder for another solution. Maybe there was a time in which that would’ve been true, but the only thing I’m desperate to give into is the choice I want to make for pure, self-developing reasons. I want to live in the throng. I want to engage with its people. I want to join communities where I can share my ideas and listen as others share theirs. That will involve putting myself out there more regularly and in the areas of my own particular interests so people will know I’m willing to engage with them individually and as a collective. This also means better developing my personal communities, making sure that close friends and family remain a healthy part of my life while I seek to grow my network.

No, I’m not a bad assistant. I complete tasks quickly, I make myself available to my team, I practice good follow-through habits, I stay organized and prioritized, I’m diplomatic but firm. These things make me a good assistant. But being an assistant won’t sustain me forever, and I don’t think anyone, my boss included, really expects it to. I need to put myself in a position where I feel like I’m allowed to take charge, where I don’t become barred down by relational dynamics, where I can practice friendliness and openness and grace with everyone I come into contact with, regardless of status. Yes, I could thrive in the corporate world with the right step stool. I actually don’t doubt myself there. And it’s not that I detest the corporate work environment. What I detest is the way the hierarchy makes you invisible or lesser to certain people, the way it makes them see you not as who you are but as your job title ranks you. I am lucky that even though these people do exist in my working life there are also people who see that I’m capable of more. But the trouble I’m having now, the part that makes me a potentially “bad” assistant, is that, after a while, I start to deflect and resent the politics of the corporate office. They make me hostile, unapproachable, bitter even. Maybe I think more of myself within my company than I should, given the lower rank of my position. And yet, I feel rather inflated. I refuse to act as though I’m “just an assistant.” I refuse to be seen as someone who’s willing to stay lodged in a cubicle for the next five years. I don’t know if a self-owned business will ever happen for me. I think that’s a matter of readiness, and while I know it’s an eventual goal I also know there are steps to take. I’ve grown up in a world of instant gratification, so the urge to make it happen now is often strong, which means the urge to give up is stronger because things rarely happen on command. I need to learn better how to take my time and put in the work. I want to allow myself the opportunity to personally develop through all the necessary stages of life and work, and the relationships it will take to get me there.

The Inner Landscape

By clearing corridors between the world we show others, and the world inside of us, perhaps we open a life of greater authenticity. We make it easier to move freely between all parts of us that wish to have a voice.
— Ruth in The Nature Letters
Photo Credit: @whitepeak_ruth on Instagram

Truth be told, I'm hesitant to begin again. This will be my third layer of effort cast over this project, The Coffee Journals. The place I've tried to make my online refuge. The place where I can comfortably, though sometimes uncomfortably given how many times I've deleted posts through an inevitable fear of "not getting it right", speak my mind about the things that bother me. And this does seem to be the initial inspiration. When I am unraveling with anxiety I question the idea, then I go through a period of depression and uncertainty before I'm so bothered by myself I decide to give it another try. I suppose that is what I'm doing now. Starting over. Though it may look as though I'm wanting to pretend none of the other things ever happened, that I never got caught off guard and derailed. But I did. I'm just particular. I want everything to look aesthetically thematic. Think of it as taking in an oversized jacket, stripping out unnecessary material and re-stitching the edges. That is what I'm doing—re-stitching myself.

One night a few weeks ago, I found White Peak Wellbeing through a vacuum of Instagram browsing. Someone I follow mentioned Ruth's account and her weekly newsletter, The Nature Letters. Intrigued, I subscribed to the newsletter and over the next few weeks watched as they landed quietly in my inbox with all of my other weekly spirit-inducing emails. One that came in last Monday caught my eye this morning as I was eating breakfast. It was titled, "On the business of Inner Landscapes and how to find and understand them." Being a person very taken with ideas that appeal not only to the ethereal inner life in conjunction with the external living experience and nature as a means of both physical and mental exploration, I was of course given special cause to read it when I would have otherwise been defending my sock-cushioned toes from a teething puppy. This morning, however, she lay in her bed completely disinterested in my presence, only concerned enough with me that I was there preventing her from isolation and loneliness while she continued to snooze.

I took this opportunity to read through the article. One paragraph in particular resonated with me in a way that I had been allowing myself to feel over the past few months but never setting aside time to put into words for myself.

In an age of social and mass media-induced status anxiety, fragmented social units and rampant consumerism, more than ever we continue to prioritise the outer landscape at the expense of our inners. Great attention is given to how the outer landscape looks and behaves, ensuring that more and more people see what we have and what we’re doing. Nurturing of the internal landscape has often become an after-thought or secondary priority. Perhaps because we erroneously think that only we will see it. As if others won’t notice or benefit from time spent developing a stable and fulfilled inner environment. Sure enough, the outer environment is where we survive in an immediate sense, but it’s my conviction that only through building corridors between our inner and outer environments that we truly become familiar with our full selves and realise how we wish to live. What is important to us. Our values. Who we really are. It’s easy to neglect our inner landscapes in the belief that they are too messy and too flawed to be known, let alone enjoyed, but by creating an inner landscape that we’re comfortable in, we might be able to create for ourselves a sanctuary where we can retreat from a noisy world.

Just last week I was telling my friend, Ashley, that I desperately needed a lifestyle change, that I had created a routine for myself that stifled rather than fertilized my existence. I'd stopped reading, I'd stopped writing, I'd stopped doing yoga. These practices I'd made into my own personal trinity of wellbeing. In addition to neglecting it, I was also not getting enough sleep. Some of it was due to our furry addition, but the crux was that I failed to find a routine that complemented the puppy's schedule. A girl from my workplace, whose son turned one last month, said that having a puppy is a lot like having a baby, now being a caretaker to both human and canine. Being that I'd still like to check 1) get married 2) have baby/ies off of my life goals list within the next ten years, it concerned me that I was taking myself so off-course with a nubile creature much more independent than a baby would be. I wondered how much of myself would even matter in those first few months. American culture teaches us that new motherhood is tolerated at best, though there are writers, such as Anne Lamott and Amanda Palmer, shattering the tortured climes in the relationship between artist and mother.

But I'm getting off topic. I've tortured myself enough. As Ruth discusses in her essay, I am not the only person affected by the undeveloped terrain of my inner landscape nor will I be the only person affected should I harvest it. In fact, the former will only serve to affect people badly if I continue to neglect myself. I shy away from the phrase "self-love" or "self-care." It's arguable that I should be less concerned with understanding myself and more concerned with understanding, say, Jesus, from a Christian perspective. I can always hear that juke in the back of my mind. But what I really think is that, yes, knowing Christ can help us understand ourselves more efficiently as Christians, but that doesn't mean we should work less at knowing who we are. If anything, the two should work in tandem. But this is the reason why I don't like using the word "self" too much. I don't want the scale to dip too heavily on either side. Weight is a relationship of balance and effort. Too much focus on one over the other leads either to extremism or narcissism. That is my personal perspective. Spirituality, regardless of faith, is inherent to the human, who must be tempered by whatever means from imploding into outright chaos.

This is also where the snag is. Because this is also how dictators think. The dictator wants complete control over his constituents rather than giving them the liberty to think for themselves. And we are terrible sometimes at assigning dictators to our lives. I'm not necessarily speaking of government. A dictator can be anything that exercises absolute power over our existence. Sometimes we are in control of this figure, sometimes not. That is the difference, though, between our inner and outer landscapes. The outer one we can influence to an extent, but the inner one will determine the legitimacy of that influence. That is why it is so crucial we nurture it. Because what we do with our interior existence converses daily with our external existence, the more obscure experience it can be hard for us to truly see and interpret. That it is so dependent upon our interior world means we must do what we can to nourish that inner landscape. It requires maintenance the way any garden or home would.

It is possible for us to grow into chaos. This is why I used the word "temper." Gardens become unwieldy, houses become dirty. They must be managed. I think, in the past, I've confused this idea with suppression. I did exactly what Ruth suggested we do when it feels like we're outgrowing or overwhelming ourselves. There were times when I thought I was too messy to bother cleaning up. But this idea in itself was suppressing. We have to do the work of tending our body, our mind, our spirit. The alternative would be to suffocate the life force out of our resolve. Resolve is the foundation on which we act. Without that conviction we have nothing by which to live. I build resolve through writing. Without writing I wouldn't know what I think. This is the first suggestion Ruth gives in order to identify our inner landscape, but it could be painting for you or taking a walk.

If I had to identify one purpose for The Coffee Journals it would be to utilize my writing here as a way to establish this abstract idea of myself as something visible and concrete. The person I've always envisioned when I think of myself doesn't have to be some fantastical, unreachable interpretation. She can be a whole, functioning human being. Last night, I was reading Lincoln in the Bardo, and there was a chapter in which the ghosts in the graveyard are tempted to relinquish their status among the in-between. One of the narrating spirits, Mr. Vollman says, "Our path is not for everyone. Many people—I do not mean to disparage them? Lack the necessary resolve." To which another narrating spirit, Mr. Bevins replies, "Nothing matters sufficiently to them, that is the thing." I think I've forgotten, or maybe never wholly understood, that which matters sufficiently to me. I don't know that I've ever had a clean, concise understanding of myself, and it has caused me to be tempted. Maybe not irredeemably, but enough that, like Willie Lincoln, I felt shrunken afterward. It's humbling when you realize you, as much as you wanted to think so highly of yourself, are not immune to downfall. It is ingrained in your DNA, your very species. The fact that you are human practically demands a leveling of ego.

Sometimes I have ego. Funnily enough, being human requires a certain amount of it. It takes ego, for instance, to think I have something worth writing publically about. It takes even more ego to actually publish the writing. Still more to share it with people, assuming it may help them. If that's the case, even Jesus had it. In fact, that's why the government hated him. Who was he? He was nobody. Except that he was everyone. In Lincoln, it mattered to the spirits that they were understood—not only in their deaths, but in their lives—and this book allows them to convey themselves in a way they've never before been offered. (I'm wondering now if the story will end with their departure.) I could be wrong, or at least projecting my current experiences onto George Saunders' intention for the book, but the spirits seem to symbolize the pieces of ourselves we want to leave behind for those who come after. The way a person would leave their mark through writing a book, composing a song, or painting an artwork. What we create becomes a ghost in itself. Even if the creation is intangible. It could be a feeling or a piece of knowledge or hope. We reverberate through others, you see. That's why this inner landscape business is so essential. No one is left untouched.

Trial & Error

He was simply impatient for his life, the real story, to start...
— Ian McEwan, On Chesil Beach
Photo taken with iPhone 6 Plus // Processed with VSCO

Photo taken with iPhone 6 Plus // Processed with VSCO

It was a weekend much like any other in our 90s-era household. My mother was in my room making my bed and I was playing with some Beanie Babies on the floor beside her. (As an only child, this was often my privilege.) It struck me for some reason, while my mother moved around the bed tucking sheets under the corners of my mattress, to stick an orange, bean-filled goldfish down the front of my pants. I pulled off my shirt and leaned over, gazing curiously at the small bulge rising underneath the zipper. "Look, Mom, I'm a boy." I poked out my belly. My mother--a steadfast traditionalist Republican--was not amused. "Lauren. Michelle. Put your shirt back on and take that thing out of your pants. You are not a boy."

This is not a story of gender conflict. This is, however, a story of identity and a woman yearning to feel at home in her own body.

Life is a series of restarts. We leave home, we leave school, we change apartments, we change jobs. Presidents come and go, and seasons, the various moons. But every day there is the same sun. And every day we are the same person. Except we're not. Not really. We are constantly shedding skin, re-growing it. We lose hair, we grow that back too. Our bodies are redeveloping on a daily basis. From the time that we are conceived we never stop changing. Change, of course, is a polite word for evolve. Among the other things this story is not, evolution is one of them. But I do think it's important to understand that, even for Christians and your strict traditionalist Republicans, evolution isn't just physical. It's mental and emotional as well, and it affects everyone whether they want to believe in it or not.

I bring this up because evolution is a scary concept to many and as a writer I consider it an obligation to discuss that which is not easily discussed, which brings about my purpose for this project. The Coffee Journals was something I started several years ago on Tumblr before moving it to Squarespace with the idea of turning it into an online literary landmark. At the time, I was experiencing tidal waves of depression that, instead of being properly dealt with, went ignored. I used this blog as a distraction. I wrote essays, book reviews, interviewed authors. I take full responsibility for these writers' time being wasted. One of my more unfortunate habits when slithering out of projects is wanting to eradicate them entirely from existence. It is a failure, yes? We don't want those to be seen. I'm going to take this moment, though, as an opportunity to forgive myself for all of them. I'm also going to take this moment to refresh and start again.

In the years that I've been on social media I've found it incredibly difficult to maintain a single identity. That's not to say I pretend to be different people completely, except for that one time in college when I tried going by the name Alice (don't ask). But I have had a lot of trouble keeping one handle or one URL or one account running. I think the trouble is that when you're young, and especially if you come from a sheltered household, you're used to being told who you are, what you think, how you feel, what you believe, who you can spend your time with. I'm an only child and it's only been in the past few years that I've really felt entitled to my own mind. I come from a family with little tolerance for differing opinions, something I struggled with through college as I began to separate the thoughts I'd been told to think from the ones that were truly mine. In some ways, social media gave me the freedom to further tease out this independent economy and I've taken the reigns on that freedom quite aggressively. If I feel like one identity isn't aligning well with my personality--or the personality I want to cultivate, at least--I've been known to ditch it in favor of trying something else. I'm 26 now and I'm still guilty of doing this.

It's odd to me that this has even been a problem in my life. Embarrassing, really. But I think, for writers anyway, identity tends to be pretty important. Ford Madox Ford, actually, was born Ford Herman Hueffer and first published as Ford Madox Hueffer before ditching his surname entirely after leaving his wife in Germany and moving to Paris.  Ernest Hemingway wrote about this in his memoir, A Moveable Feast:

’There were many reasons. He changed it after the war.’

Ford had started the
Transatlantic Review. He had once edited The English Review in London before the war and before his domestic trouble and Ezra told me this had been a really good review and Ford had done a splendid job of editing. Now under his new name, he was making a new start.
— pgs. 200-201

People--but artists especially, I think--are in the habit of perceiving themselves as a series of trials and errors. It's practically Biblical. Whenever we shed one shameful skin we want to wield something that signifies this personal evolution in hopes that this will be the trial that ends in our favor. Naming is perhaps the most significant aspect of our person for this reason. It's not only what we want others to see when they think of us, but it's also how we want to see ourselves.

The other day, one of the men in my office--we'll call him James--asked me if my real name was Lauren. I elected to go by Wren at my new job when I started the summer of 2015, even though no one ever called me this and had only been used a couple of times as a pen name for my writing. I told him yes, it was. "So where did Wren come from?" he asked. When I first made this decision people wanted to give me a hard time about it. I told James I had used it when I had some stories published in a couple literary journals and ended up liking it better. Which is true, to an extent. I didn't fully justify my reasoning. This was because I don't know James that well. He's older, early 60s maybe, and I had a feeling I was already coming off fairly odd to him. The larger reason is that I wanted some agency over the person I aged into, and where Lauren is a nice name I wanted to control not only the way I was seen or how I felt about myself, but I wanted to commit to the work of becoming a better person and, as I said before, naming was the best way to signify this evolvement.

It wasn't so much that I expected to have people call me this and suddenly I would be this whole different person. For the first six months of my job I felt like a complete idiot, questioned my decision, and wondered if I'd made an inglorious mistake. Hearing people call me a name that wasn't actually mine began to sound irksome, but that was only because I didn't feel I deserved it. Some people who already knew me as Lauren went so far as to tell me it was akin to lying and that I was tricking people into thinking I was someone I wasn't. I took this criticism very seriously, as writers do. But I stuck with it and worked through the insecurity born of these disagreements, mostly out of stubbornness. Though I worried over the same things they were accusing me of I stood by my right to reinvent myself if I wanted to. From there, feeling truly like Wren was a combination of time, repetitive association, and learning not to give a fuck what people thought. It also helped, though, to hear certain people call me Wren--people who knew that wasn't really my name but were kind enough to humor my effort.

There was also a bit of professional calculation to my decision. As a mortgage assistant, I was told I'd be accompanying loan officers to open house events and to meet with clients. Wren, though entirely southern, is not a widely used name where I'm from and certainly not as common as Lauren. I felt there could be a certain distinction in using a name that not a lot of people had, especially in a business that uses name association so fervently. I thought it would be especially beneficial if I ever decided to become a loan officer myself. Unfortunately, due to the business's ever-evolving nature, that all became a moot point. I no longer go to open houses nor do I accompany loan officers on client meetings. But I don't regret the decision. I feel more at home in this name than I ever did as Lauren. Not least because I chose it and work very hard to own it.

We cannot Name or be Named without language. If our vocabulary dwindles to a few shopworn words, we are setting ourselves up for takeover by a dictator. When language becomes exhausted, our freedom dwindles—we cannot think; we do not recognize danger; injustice strikes us as no more than ‘the way things are.’
— Madeleine L'Engle, Walking on Water: Reflections on Faith and Art

Earlier this year, I was crossing Main Street for a short walk one afternoon. Bourbon was still open for lunch then so the sidewalk was crowded with diners. There was also a man sitting on the bench in front of the restaurant. He was large, scruffy--I couldn't really tell what he looked like due to the salt and pepper beard fluffed out over his chest. He wore a brown coat and baseball cap. He wasn't sitting with anyone, just leaning alone against the window watching people pass by. As I came to the other side of the street and began to veer left around the black iron tables he called out to me, "Hey Wren-girl, how are you?" My confusion as to how this man knew my name, or at least knew me by Wren, shifted me into polite robotics. Hello, I'm good, how are you? I didn't stop to talk. My mother's anxious nurturing, and not to mention an unpleasant encounter with an older man at a Books-A-Million the year before, reminded me that a lot of the time when men take interest in you it's not always innocent. But I couldn't stop thinking about this encounter the whole way up the street and he was gone, of course, when I walked back down the other side.

I don't believe I had been in any danger with this man. Actually, my instincts told me something very different, which was that he, whoever he was, had a warm and friendly nature. It's sad, yet helpful in this way, that I've experienced enough unsettling situations with the opposite sex that my intuition has developed a sense for innocence versus malice. While I think that people can be manipulative to the point where that instinct becomes compromised, those realizations take time and I had been judging the situation off a passing greeting. There was something unsuspectingly mysterious about his presence--that he would be there this one afternoon in which I'd been stewing on my identity and wondering if it would become another error. Both the beauty and the ugliness of experience is that we can decide from there what to do with it. It is beautiful if we use experience to further our humanity; it is ugliness if we use it as an excuse to shrivel ourselves and each other. That I felt I could be better as Wren rather than Lauren was a personal decision. At that point, it had nothing to do with career. It wasn't so much that I wanted to forget who I had been, more so I wanted to build off of her. I needed to lose some of her weight, though. She had been a part of my life, but she no longer had to be my life. I could move on and I could do it however worked best for me.

Something useful that I've learned this year is that you can't always compartmentalize your life. Things usually have to work adjacent to one another, if not smoothly. But one of your selves' turmoil is another of your selves' artwork. After so many failed attempts, I finally understood how to work through chaos. Elizabeth Gilbert's TED Talk becomes relevant here. Regardless of what is happening, you have to sit down and do the work, you have to show up and be a part of it, and then that mysterious other will join you to solidify your intent. It will sidle up beside you and fill the spaces you have no control over. Together, despite the lingering madness, you will create something someone else needs. In the words of Sarah Manguso: "If people read your work and, as a result, choose life, then you are doing your job." And that, essentially, is why this project exists, why it is Wren who must be the one to keep going.